For some reason you dont seem to understand the concept of link juice and how NoFollow prevents that from flowing onto a recipient site....
you are the one that keeps using the term "link Juice" and not I... I keep saying I do understand that no follow does NOT pass juice. I am not talking about juice.. I am speaking about other elements ( i wont repeat them )
Further you've taken terms such as trust, authority, reputation and made up a big pile of horse cr** of which none of it makes any sense... Seriously don't you realize that link juice is reflective of those attributes in the first place??? Why are you attempting to invent additional attributes and then making up stuff that these things bypass NoFollow???
Lets go into a few things first... lets keep in mind the videos above are from 2011.. Specifically March of 2011. JUNE 2011 introduced Google Authorship... Which was an attempt to identify and match content with its writer, and in a sense link it back to a primary home. There was some point there that they decided it would be great to link all this back to G+... Dec 2014 the project was stopped.
At the same time ( June 2011 ) as Google Authorship is being rolled out, the joint venture ( Bing Google and Yahoo! ) aka Schema also released the use of "Author Markup" For those not to familiar with one or the other or both, the significant difference is in the coding itself. Google Authorship was an HTML based tag, and the Schema markup was / is html5 based microdata. Given that the time frame here is 2011, I can only assume that Google had more faith in the HTML based tag and believed there would be more universal adoption - that ultimately was not the case.
So then we get into mid 2014 and searchmetrics releases a study ( to read it is a download, and there is a required opt-in and I know there is a rule to linking to such pages ) if you goto searchmetrics in their knowledge base and search schema, you will find the study. They state that within their study, pages with Schema ranked 4 positions higher on average, and then roll out the blanket.. "This statement should be treated with caution"
All the while with this Google says that Schema is not a ranking factor.. but the markup details are present through out serps.. be it reviews or social links or hours of operation etc.
So lets tie this all together... If you use the Author markup more as a citation, and I will explain. With in a page you set the author to "You" and then as an example make a comment on a blog.. when you do so there is generally a place for a name, a web address, an email address, and a comment. IF you match the name "You" within the comment to match the "You" to the linked page there becomes a connection. The "You" in such a scenario is usually the link text as well.
The exact opposite can be done as well.. you can identify the text on another page that may have details of you or your business or what have you. You can then identify the details and where the details are located and through markup link to that location ( this linking does not have to be visible on the page by the way )
So then we need to better understand what it is I call "Trust". The elements you are discussing would be more related to "TrustFlow" which has more to do with proximity of links to seed sites, and I work more with LDR ( Linking Domain Relevancy ) By all means LDR should of course be considered in a follow scenario... but it should be considered in ALL scenarios. An instance I think many may be able to understand here would be a client that has a propensity to post all over the web on this forum and that blog and here and there, leaving their web address anywhere and everywhere. LDR is shot right in the foot. I think we could all agree this is generally not good for overall Site ranking ability... and if that is the case, then paying attention to LDR as a tool, would could and does have the exact opposite reaction.. a ranking boost.
Here is the deal,If I knew I had data that i could present that you could look at and say "Oh that works" I would... but you tell me..what would that look like? Someone else wanted proof that I could rank a page with no backlinks.. I provided that, and still that was not enough.. ( granted it was only for a term such as "service" and "city name" ) they wanted traffic.... again, how am I going to show that and there not be any amount of disbelief?
The answer here is simple enough... I gave you the guidelines to the method... its not like its going to hurt anything.. try it for yourself.. you tell me if it works.
D: :hysterical:
