Edward Stevens
New member
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2015
- Messages
- 2
- Points
- 0
Hi everyone,
My company is planning to hold webinar for our partners, but we have some questions about choosing video streaming solutions for our webinars.
We are considering Gotowebinar which is famous and adopted by many people.
It's quite convenient and cost-efficient for us, and seems accepted by many users. However, we want to keep our webinars as videos on-demand for our audience after the activity finishes. But Gotowebinar doesn't allow people to watch video recordings on their platform. We have to upload the video to other platform like YouTube.
We are still considering another solution. Its name is Gridow. It is developed by a Taiwan company. Their sales man introduces this solution to us. It actually provides all the functions we need, including doing webinar or other live program, and we can make our programs as videos on-demand for our audiences. But, it is newly developed solution, and we are worrying about how our audiences think about this platform. It looks like this[URLnf="http://bit.ly/1G6nxRg"] here[/URLnf]. Would you think the interface with two screens of presenter and material is more attractive for audiences?
Could anybody give us any suggestion about which one to choose? Or you have other better solutions?
Thanks
My company is planning to hold webinar for our partners, but we have some questions about choosing video streaming solutions for our webinars.
We are considering Gotowebinar which is famous and adopted by many people.
It's quite convenient and cost-efficient for us, and seems accepted by many users. However, we want to keep our webinars as videos on-demand for our audience after the activity finishes. But Gotowebinar doesn't allow people to watch video recordings on their platform. We have to upload the video to other platform like YouTube.
We are still considering another solution. Its name is Gridow. It is developed by a Taiwan company. Their sales man introduces this solution to us. It actually provides all the functions we need, including doing webinar or other live program, and we can make our programs as videos on-demand for our audiences. But, it is newly developed solution, and we are worrying about how our audiences think about this platform. It looks like this[URLnf="http://bit.ly/1G6nxRg"] here[/URLnf]. Would you think the interface with two screens of presenter and material is more attractive for audiences?
Could anybody give us any suggestion about which one to choose? Or you have other better solutions?
Thanks
